Considering "states" without the historical processes ( pidginization and creolization) that produced them leads to confusion and certain common misunderatandings of pidgin and creole language systems as somehow less developed than other languages, a trait often attributed to the speakers of such languages too, at least in older accounts and popular understandings of pidgins and creoles as "broken" languages (for more on this see the review of how the field of pidgin and creole studies developed) . Creole languages, according to some, only differ from other languages in their history. Often, that history gets confused with the language itself by those who think of pidgins and creoles, but not pidginization and creolization.